# Contact and correction notes

> Correspondence | Oklahoma Functional Medicine — Oklahoma Functional Medicine contact information: no correspondence channel is available; these correction notes identify details useful for checking a claim.

**Correspondence**

A disagreement about a measurement is welcome. An exact sentence and the relevant passage of a paper give it somewhere to start.

## Contact availability

There is no public correspondence address or working message form for this site. This page cannot receive a message, a medical question or a request for care. A contact heading can suggest a monitored inbox; I have no such channel to offer.

## Factual correction details

For checking a disputed claim, the useful starting points are the page path, the exact sentence, the linked paper's title and the passage that supports a different conclusion. A distinction between mineral content and volumetric density can matter as much as a numerical error.

I would distinguish disagreement with an opinion from disagreement about the experimental record. A proposed strength test is a preference; an incorrectly reported study outcome is a factual problem. The [bone discussion](/bone-dimensions) and the [reading list](/references) put those questions within reach of the relevant papers.

---

At Oklahoma Functional Medicine, published research about bodily function satisfies my curiosity; this editorial site runs no business and supplies no medical advice.