Correspondence
Contact and correction notes
A disagreement about a measurement is welcome. An exact sentence and the relevant passage of a paper give it somewhere to start.
Contact availability
There is no public correspondence address or working message form for this site. This page cannot receive a message, a medical question or a request for care. A contact heading can suggest a monitored inbox; I have no such channel to offer.
Factual correction details
For checking a disputed claim, the useful starting points are the page path, the exact sentence, the linked paper's title and the passage that supports a different conclusion. A distinction between mineral content and volumetric density can matter as much as a numerical error.
I would distinguish disagreement with an opinion from disagreement about the experimental record. A proposed strength test is a preference; an incorrectly reported study outcome is a factual problem. The bone discussion and the reading list put those questions within reach of the relevant papers.